Why Modi must go: Vote for what suits us, not him

A well-wisher asked me whether we shouldn’t be voting for a leader with vision than bring in a khichdi government. It is a legitimate question that deserves an answer.

Vision is too big a statement for any Indian politician. Any visionary leader would invest in its youth, but the payback is over 15-20 years and no leader has done that. Leaders are elected for five years and are always in campaign mode for the next municipal, local body and state elections.

Modi has campaigned more and governed less, strategised on elections more than for the country, ruled more and administered less, promised more and performed less, spoke more and heard less, ranted more and felt less, advised more and solved less.

Pulwama, DeMo, etc,. could have been prevented if he indeed kept India first in his heart and head. He is more of a short-term trader counting his pennies every night than a Warren Buffet investing for future to create wealth. He thinks like a hedge fund meant for Saudi Arabia than a growth fund designed for India.

We are also a nation ruled by a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). A visionary builds an able team than empower only those loyal to himself.

A nation of 1.3 billion is ruled by a family council that moved from Ahmedabad along with Modi. They include Amit Shah, Hasmukh Adhia, the Mishras, the Joshis et al. They failed to impose Rakesh Asthana in CBI too. Even home ministry under Rajnath is infiltrated with those who worked in Modi’s Gujarat.

India is now a nation where institutions that are meant to strategise for nation-building have become PR offices of the government.

NITI Ayog strategises less and justifies more, the CSO builds algorithms to downplay the past and overplay the present, RBI spent four years to count notes and justify the DeMo blunder, NSSO has been systematically killed, job data is adulterated, crime data vanished, farm distress data is embargoed. CBI works harder to fix political opponents and the NSA burns midnight oil to bring small-time criminals to book.

We now have a leader who works on building perception than changing reality.

Known by company he keeps

Modi’s chief strategist is Amit Shah, chief campaigner is Yogi Adityanath, chief economist is Anil Bokil, chief banker is Gurumurthy. A bunch of CAs is our response to international economists questions on the economy.

Simply put, we are officially run by quacks who think they know the cure better than qualified doctors. The hard work to Harvard debate is taken to a new level. They are antipathic to science, knowledge and intelligence and that is dangerous.

Visionary known by issues he fights for

His chief strategist, Amit Shah fights for a Rath Yatra, Yogi for a Ram Temple, NSA for nailing Gandhis, CBI for jailing opponents. 2014 was all about jobs, corruption and development. 2019 would all be about Pakistan, Ram Mandir, Muslims and Gandhis. That in no measure is vision!

Governed by the sick

All that matters is loyalty to the leader. At the height of tensions with China & Pakistan and economic crisis, we had sick ministers in absentia running defence and finance ministries.

Anant Kumar, Jaitley, Sushma Swaraj, Manohar Parrikar etc. enjoyed perks while being medically unfit and India paid the price with Doklam, DeMo and execution blunders of GST. And the hunger for power is such that Goa was ruled by a half-dead man and the swearing-in happened as the ashes of the dead leader were still hot. This is no less than a sedition!

Nation of rich absconders

Forget getting Dawood back from Pakistan, we have enabled criminals to flee. Vijay Mallya, Nirav Modi, Mehul Choksi, Nitin Sandesara of Sterling Biotech, Jatin Mehta of Winsome Diamonds have all fled under the watchful eyes of the chowkidar.

India is constantly made to debate historical questions of ‘What if’, justifying every action with ‘whataboutery’ and taking accountability to a zero.

Not all citizens equal/secure

We divide people with every petty election. We have hate-mongers driving public discourse. Elections are fought on Shamshan vs Kabrastan, Ali vs Bajrang Bali. And this is only a prelude to 2019.

We drive away intellect. We punish integrity. We loathe questions. Raghuram Rajan, Arvind Subramaniam, Arvind Panagriya, Urjit Patel, Justice Chalameshwar and Alok Verma are just a short list. Every dissenting voice bit the dust, every person with a spine stood bloodied and was uprooted.

And this demagoguery costs India more.

Sushma, Gadkari, Rajnath, Suresh Prabhu, Nitish Kumar, Raman Singh, Shiv Raj Chouhan are victims while Smriti Irani, Giriraj Singh and Yogi Adityanath are beneficiaries. But loyalty to the throne and insecurity of the leader will hurt even efficient BJP supporters while benefitting those that will cost India.

We no longer take opportunities to change the course of history. Kartarpur was an opportunity. The PDP + BJP rule was an opportunity. The international crude price was an opportunity. The absolute majority was an opportunity. The anti-corruption movement was an opportunity. And every opportunity was systematically squandered away.

We now have a leader who believes in monologues to a captive audience than a dialogue with the well-informed.

He knows his failings in performance and will not allow any forensic scrutiny of his achievements. The arrogance is telling. The apathy screams. The negligence cries. The leader of the largest democracy in the world refuses to being questioned.

So, here we are as a country. Our policies are made by quacks, our institutions subservient to individuals, our thinking is of day traders and hawala operators, our statisticians work hard to show others smaller, our policy makers work on building perceptions than changing reality, our leaders reward loyalty than efficiency. We promote cronies to competitors, indulge sycophants than well meaning critics,

For sure, it would be a khichdi in 2019 with Mayawati, Akhilesh, KCR and Stalin deciding who the next PM would be. Modi would not be a compulsion and may not be an option too.

And even if he were to be a PM, he would be heading that same Khichdi Govt.

In the circumstances, what do we do? We now must reclaim our lost ground. We must vote for the political party which will think peace, think ahead, looks to the future and builds hope.

We vote for goodness than evil, humanity than religion, performance than perception and for hope than fear. We vote to be free than imprisoned. We vote for what suits us than what suits them. We vote ourselves in. We Vote. To change. And not be changed.

We Vote. To Change.

(The author is the Chairman and CEO, Careers 360)