The Supreme Court hearing on pleas seeking an independent probe into the death of Special CBI judge BH Loya turned acrimonious on Monday with lawyers for the petitioners exchanging barbs after one of the petitioners seeking a probe appeared to be diluting his stand. A heated exchange between two senior counsels Dushyant Dave and Pallav Sisodia erupted after Dave accused the latter of "sabotage".
While Dave is appearing for Bombay Lawyers Association, Sisodia is appearing for Maharashtra-based journalist Bandhuraj Sambhaji Lone. Both had moved the top court seeking an independent probe into the death of Judge Loya, who was presiding over the special CBI court holding trial into Sohrabuddin Sheikh staged shoot out case in which BJP president Amit Shah was one of the accused, but later discharged.
Asking the bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice DY Chandrachud to pass "appropriate orders" including about "accountability of persons responsible", Sisodia, in his two page note said: "...an independent probe can't be one way traffic in which persons making allegations can just 'hit and run' without any responsibility to damages caused to the reputation, prestige and faith in institutions" including the top court and judiciary as a whole. Dave, who had concluded his arguments on last Friday, described the position articulated by Sisodia on behalf of his client as "sabotage". Dave also again raised the issue that senior counsel Harish Salve had appeared for Amit Shah and was now appearing for Maharashtra government, and alleged that Salve is trying to protect Shah.
Published: undefined
“I need not present a prima facie case. Threshold is a strong suspicion causing alert that it warrants an investigation,” said V Giri, concluding his arguments
Earlier, arguing for a petitioner, senior counsel V Giri pointed to the discrepancies in the documents submitted by the Maharashtra government relating to Judge Loya's case. He said that the statements of 16 people have not been recorded and it gives enough reasons to arouse suspicion. "I need not present a prima facie case. Threshold is a strong suspicion causing alert that it warrants an investigation," Giri said concluding his arguments.
In the course of the hearing, Dave sought the court's permission to file an application seeking to cross-examine the people named in the documents relating to the death of Judge Loya. The application was filed later in the day.
According to the website livelaw.in, the persons include:
Dave also sought the nod of the court to file a video recording of the statements of Loya's father and sister, which he said were at variance with the one submitted by police.
Senior counsel Indira Jaising told the court that the register maintained at Ravi Bhawan where judge Loya had stayed, did not have his name or that of other two judges. She also wondered how can three judges stay in a room which was meant for two only, that too when other rooms were available in the guest house.
The next hearing in the case is on Friday, February 9.
Published: undefined
With IANS inputs.
Published: undefined
Follow us on: Facebook, Twitter, Google News, Instagram
Join our official telegram channel (@nationalherald) and stay updated with the latest headlines
Published: undefined