The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) has declined to entertain an RTI application seeking details of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech made on April 3 during he gave a call to countrymen to light candles and lamps for 9 minutes at 9 pm on April 5, after sitting on the application for nearly two months.
In his 11-minute message to the people, the PM had termed it as an attempt to show Coronavirus, the strength of Indian unity and ‘light’. “We must all go through this darkness together. Those who are most affected by this are the poor and marginalised. To overcome this darkness, we must all unite to spread the light. Make this darkness of Coronavirus meet the light we all spread,” the Prime Minister had said as India completed the first ten days of the 21-day lockdown.
Published: undefined
The PMO gave a one line response to the application filed by RTI activist and journalist Navneet Chaturvedi, saying, “The query sought is in the form of roving enquiry and does not come under the definition of information as per Section 2 (f) of the RTI Act, 2005”.
Seeking information under the RTI Act 2005,Chaturvedi had filed an application asking:
Published: undefined
He received the reply sent by the PMO on June4.
Reacting to the denial of information under the RTI Act, Chaturvedi said that the Modi government has made a mockery of the RTI Act.
“Instead of fighting the battle against the pandemic with scientific temperament, the PM resorted to symbolism,” he said.
When asked why he sought to know the name of the speech writer, Chaturvedi explained, “I sought to know the name of the speech writer because I believe sanctity of the PMO must be maintained. The PMO is not supposed to work as a political branch of the ruling party and PM’s speech was full of symbolism and falsehood, therefore it is important to know the name of the writer.”
Published: undefined
Talking to NH, Chaturvedi said that he has filed an RTI with the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) also, seeking information about the “availability of firecrackers”, which were widely used by people during the event. “But the MHA has not replied yet though 60 days have passed,” said Chaturvedi.
Published: undefined
Follow us on: Facebook, Twitter, Google News, Instagram
Join our official telegram channel (@nationalherald) and stay updated with the latest headlines
Published: undefined